Agroskin, D., & Jonas, E. (2013). Controlling death by defending ingroups – Mediational insights into terror management and control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1144-1158. |
Agroskin, D., Jonas, E., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2015). When suspicious minds go political: Distrusting and justifying the system at the same time. Political Psychology, 36(6), 613-629. |
Agroskin, D., Klackl, J., & Jonas, E. (2014). The self-liking brain: A VBM study on the structural substrate of self-esteem. PLOS ONE 9(1): e86430 |
Du, H., Jonas, E., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Hui, E.K., & Ma, L. (2013). Cultural influences on terror management: Independent and interdependent self-esteem as anxiety buffers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1002-1011. |
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A.-M., & Schultz, M. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19-32. |
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., & Fankhänsel, T. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 523-541. |
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., & Kessler, T. (2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 101-136. |
Graupmann, V., Jonas, E., Meier, E., Hawelka, S., & Aichhorn, M. (2012). Reactance, the self and its group: When threats to freedom come from the in-group vs. the out-group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 164-173. |
Greenberg, J., Martens, A., Jonas, E., Eisenstadt, D., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (2003). Psychological defense in anticipation of anxiety: eliminating the potential for anxiety eliminates the effect of mortality salience on worldview defense. Psychological Science, 14, 516-519. |
Jodlbauer, B., & Jonas, E. (2011). Forecasting clients´ reactions: How does the perception of strategic behavior influence the acceptance of advice? International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 121-133. |
Klackl, J., Jonas, E., & Fritsche, I. (in press). Neural evidence that the behavioral inhibition system is involved in existential threat processing. Social Neuroscience. |
Klackl, J., Jonas, E., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Existential neuroscience: Self-esteem moderates neuronal responses to mortality-related stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1754-1761 |
Klackl, J., Jonas., E., & Kronbichler, M. (2013). Existential neuroscience: Neurophysiological correlates of proximal defenses against death-related thoughts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(3), 333-340. |
Klackl, J., Pfundmaier, M., Agroskin, D., & Jonas, E. (2012). Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal. Biological Psychology, 92, 387-394. |
Mackinger, B.,& Jonas, E. (2012). How do incentives lead to deception in advisor-client interactions? Explicit and implicit strategies of self-interested deception. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 527. |
Sittenthaler, S., Jonas, E., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). Explaining self and vicarious reactance: A process model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4), 458-470. |
Sittenthaler, S., Steindl, C., & Jonas, E. (2015). Legitimate vs. illegitimate restrictions – a motivational and physiological approach investigating reactance processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00632 |
Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Jonas, E. (2015). Observing the restriction of another person: Vicarious reactance and the role of self-construal and culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01052 |
Steindl, C., & Jonas, E. (2015). The dynamic reactance interaction – How vested interests affect people’s experience, behavior, and cognition in social interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01752 |
Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(4), 205-214. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222 |
Streicher, B., Jonas, E., Maier, G.W., Frey, D., & Spießberger, A. (2012). Procedural fairness and creativity: Does voice maintain people´s creative vein over time? Creativity Research Journal,24(4),358-363. |